Texture became extremely important to me as I lost my sight. I'm sure sighted people relate to texture in their own way, but to me texture is a very sensual thing. Touch is how I explore what things are; the richer the textures the better. Textures create for me interesting patterns. I love adjoining them with one another to complete a tapestry of sorts where nature is concerned especially. I am sure that textures must be pleasing visually but touching the textures is far more enjoyable I think.
For instance: even dirt has texture. When it has settled down and packed into itself it seems dull and rather lifeless. When you take the little hand spade and turn the dirt over to expose its rich texture and make it all airy and velvety and froth it up so the plants look more green in it and happy .... Well, there you have wonderful texture that breathes and exudes a new look that is fresh and feels so lovely between the fingers. It makes for better photos too.
My friends tell me that it is fun to go with me when I want to shop. They laugh when I pick the most expensive garments from the racks. I tell them it's my ability to feel good, quality texture. Try it. Wear a blindfold and feel the fabrics of the clothing on a big circular rack sometime. If you have a sensitive touch you will be able to tell which of the fabrics are quality fabrics. It's not that difficult.
So, too, in nature one can develop an eye or "feel" for what texture can do for a photo. Gardens lend themselves well to these kind of rich shots. Some I have taken of different kinds of flowers, some in pots surrounded by spikey iris by a stump next to a clearing with gravel and an old craggy fence have been great texture-filled photos which lent themselves well to black and white stills. At least they were fun to shoot and fun to take as I felt where to point the camera!
Don't underestimate the role texture plays. Coupled with the right light -- and that wouldn't be the glaring, bright light of a hot summer day, the end result can be stunning ... if the camera, patience and a steady hand persist.
Signing Off For Now!
Susan Gjolmesli and Inez
Process is as much an artistic experience as the object created. In this project, I follow a photographer who is blind, crafting her personal experience into a public one that can be shared by others.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Friday, August 21, 2009
Frame 3: "What I've Learned About Light"
When I first met with Tess I really had no idea why she wanted to talk to me. As she unraveled her concept my inner self was very difficult to contain. The creative juices were "boinging" all over the place as it were. My husband can tell you that if I am left to ponder for 45 minutes it can be "dangerous", as in his world it usually translates to "work"! In mine, it's a fun project which ends up to be aesthetically pleasing -- a work of art, usually in wood, or in nature in one of my many gardens.
When Tess asked if I knew of anyone who would like to participate in a photography experiment of this kind who was blind or visually impaired -- I rather selfishly said -- "how about me?" Truly, I was so happy she said "yes!"
She modified the camera and that was helpful, especially for the distance settings. The others were helpful but my memory is good and there aren't too many others to keep straight. The camera does rather feel like a child's toy but I am learning to respect it more and more. The first time I tried loading the film though I was a wreck! I have small fingers and they are sensitive, have a light touch and are very adept. But they felt -- well -- untrained and stiff and like they were all thumbs. But after having loaded several rolls of film I am quite good at it and certainly I am much faster now!
I still stress about winding the film and getting the number correctly. I have no vision really and I want so to be measured and precise -- am I a perfectionist? Well, in some things, yes. I have had to loosen up where this camera is concerned, though.
I find shooting inanimate things is easy -- or a person and inanimate things. My Seeing Eye Dog is a good poser and she truly understands the concept of having her picture taken. She will stay in a pose (remarkable!) until the shutter clicks! Then she runs around in a gleeful dance as if to say "Oh, I did so well! Look at me, I'm sooo pretty!" Inez is the perfect model that way. My other dog, Nellie --hmmm, not so much. It is a struggle and to try to capture them together --impossible.
Tess asked me why I was drawn to the project . I told her that though I am blind I still have a "visual" context. I was a designer in past years. Even as a visually impaired person I went to floral design school in Denver and graduated top in the class. This was after the school owner told me on the first day "People like you don't belong in this business." I stood there at the time with my white cane and thought, "I'll show you, lady." And I endured the first two weeks of torture to emerge victorious.
I know therefore about balance, texture, depth, and most of all I have learned about light. Color I know too but that is a dimension I need not worry about in this artistic form.
Light is all I have left where "sight" is concerned. It can be a friend or a fiend. The glare often, depending on the day and the atmospheric conditions, can be excruciatingly painful for me. Or, in the soft morning light of early morning, or in the golden hues of evening as the sun bids us adieu, it is tender with its touch. That is my favorite time to capture the images, as I know the gold must bathe each object richly with exquisitely different light. Finding the unexpected within the hopefully expected image is like opening a present.
My next lesson is to learn how to hold the shutter open longer... And to possibly use a small tripod. That, I think, may prove difficult in the beginning as I like to be in control (ah, a revealing statement!) and hold the camera myself.
Until next time this is your photographer at large and her faithful Seeing eye Dog...
Susan Gjolmesli and Inez
When Tess asked if I knew of anyone who would like to participate in a photography experiment of this kind who was blind or visually impaired -- I rather selfishly said -- "how about me?" Truly, I was so happy she said "yes!"
She modified the camera and that was helpful, especially for the distance settings. The others were helpful but my memory is good and there aren't too many others to keep straight. The camera does rather feel like a child's toy but I am learning to respect it more and more. The first time I tried loading the film though I was a wreck! I have small fingers and they are sensitive, have a light touch and are very adept. But they felt -- well -- untrained and stiff and like they were all thumbs. But after having loaded several rolls of film I am quite good at it and certainly I am much faster now!
I still stress about winding the film and getting the number correctly. I have no vision really and I want so to be measured and precise -- am I a perfectionist? Well, in some things, yes. I have had to loosen up where this camera is concerned, though.
I find shooting inanimate things is easy -- or a person and inanimate things. My Seeing Eye Dog is a good poser and she truly understands the concept of having her picture taken. She will stay in a pose (remarkable!) until the shutter clicks! Then she runs around in a gleeful dance as if to say "Oh, I did so well! Look at me, I'm sooo pretty!" Inez is the perfect model that way. My other dog, Nellie --hmmm, not so much. It is a struggle and to try to capture them together --impossible.
Tess asked me why I was drawn to the project . I told her that though I am blind I still have a "visual" context. I was a designer in past years. Even as a visually impaired person I went to floral design school in Denver and graduated top in the class. This was after the school owner told me on the first day "People like you don't belong in this business." I stood there at the time with my white cane and thought, "I'll show you, lady." And I endured the first two weeks of torture to emerge victorious.
I know therefore about balance, texture, depth, and most of all I have learned about light. Color I know too but that is a dimension I need not worry about in this artistic form.
Light is all I have left where "sight" is concerned. It can be a friend or a fiend. The glare often, depending on the day and the atmospheric conditions, can be excruciatingly painful for me. Or, in the soft morning light of early morning, or in the golden hues of evening as the sun bids us adieu, it is tender with its touch. That is my favorite time to capture the images, as I know the gold must bathe each object richly with exquisitely different light. Finding the unexpected within the hopefully expected image is like opening a present.
My next lesson is to learn how to hold the shutter open longer... And to possibly use a small tripod. That, I think, may prove difficult in the beginning as I like to be in control (ah, a revealing statement!) and hold the camera myself.
Until next time this is your photographer at large and her faithful Seeing eye Dog...
Susan Gjolmesli and Inez
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Frame 2: 120 Film
The black and white film we used for the Holga, a 120 sized film, comes on a plastic spool about 2" wide. I decided to use Kodak for this project; not only is it less expensive than other brands, the film itself feels thicker and has more friction, making it a little easier both to load into the camera and also load onto a developing reel. We used standard 400 speed film, which is pretty good for covering most lighting situations, and has the advantage of being compatible with the chemical processes used in the college darkroom lab.
With film in the camera, any time the shutter is opened, light will enter the camera and expose the film lying against the inside of the camera back. This image is about 2" wide (the approximate width of the film) by 2" high. The film is manufactured to hold 12 such images, but there are things one can do to vary this. Rolling film only partway, for example, will single-expose a 2" swatch and double-expose a swatch matching how far one rolled the film. You can shoot entire rolls like this; they come out looking a little "artistic", as the exposure is different across the real estate of the film, but I've had some really good results with this method and enjoy shooting this way.
Since Holgas are cheap, people modify them to hold 35mm film (exposing a bigger swatch of the film than one normally is used to), or two rolls of 35mm film one above the other. Or you can shoot a roll of 35mm on the lower half of the roll and then re-shoot it on the upper half of the roll. The possibilities for really wild uses of film are endless.
For 120 film, a plastic frame can be clipped into the camera, allowing you to expose less than the 2" wide swatch.
In my opinion, the best use of 120 film is the square exposure that is approximately 2" by 2" (or 6 x 6 centimeters, as 120 implies). I find these proportions very graceful. The negative is large and the image crisp (one hopes). It is far easier to work with a grain focuser and I am generally enlarging to a lesser degree than I would enlarge a 35mm negative. When printing onto, say, 8 x 10" paper the image occupies a nice position with landscape orientation. The balance created by the white margin gives a pleasant weight.
With a Holga, the image is captured so that the floor or horizon of the subject runs parallel to the edge of the film. This makes handling of the negatives straightforward; they face you directly when you lay them out in negative sleeves or in a negative carrier for the enlarger. I mention this because my Mamiya C3 (an old-fashioned portrait photographer's twin lens camera) and other such cameras capture the subject with the floor or horizon of the image running perpendicular to the edge of the film. Since the image faces run lengthwise, this makes for more steps in handling them when working with them. So there was yet another reason for using the Holga with 120 film.
When shooting with 120 film, it rolls off of its plastic spool and onto another spool. When done shooting, you remove both the film (rolled onto the takeup spool) and the original but now empty film spool. You can recycle the original spool over to become the take-up spool for the next roll of film.
The film is removed from the camera without letting it spring open to expose everything you took all that time to photograph. There are fiddly bits of paper the size of a cigar band you can moisten and wrap around the roll to hold it secure. I usually put the film into a piece of aluminum foil for security. I might store it in the refrigerator if I can't develop it right away.
The next step is done in the dark, ideally in a film-loading cubicle, which is a light-tight closet except for the barest bit of light one can discern peeking beneath the door. I always lean way over the work table in the closet. In case I drop the film, it hopefully will not fall onto the floor and risk becoming exposed. To develop the film, you release and unwind the roll, separating the film from its backing paper. The bit of tape that held the two together can be folded over the edge of the film. Then the film is inserted into and rolled onto a plastic reel in such a manner that none of the photographic surfaces touch each other. You can imagine an old movie projector, with film rolling from spool to spool. Imagine the spools being made such that there is space between the film surfaces as the film rolls onto the spool. In this way, the 120 film spool can be placed into a developing tank, and with the right agitation during development, all of the film will receive appropriate contact with the developing media.
Another reason for using Kodak film is the size of the film. Because the exposed surface is larger, to me it presents a larger accident waiting to happen. With a more delicate film I worry about introducing wrinkles into the film as I load it onto the developing reel, and about scratching the film. The film is vulnerable in the developing tank when I am agitating the chemicals across the surface, even so, I try to agitate gently. Lastly, other films I've tried require a longer developing time, and over the life of a project this can add to a significant increase in time.
There is a critical time when the film is hanging to dry and it is vulnerable to scratches and to dust. This can be the bane of working with film in a shared or academic environment. On more than one occasion I've come upon a student -- so captivated by an image -- leaning into the drying racks, eagerly flicking the protective curtain this way and that, and more than likely dusting everyone's negatives with fine particles from the curtain (which is intended to be a dust magnet.)
This first batch that Susan shot included 5 rolls of film. For safety's sake, I developed these in three separate batches, each taking a little over an hour. I then hung the negatives to dry for about an hour and a half each.
When the negatives were dry, I cut them into segments to fit into clear plastic negative sleeves. Each roll fits on a page of negative sleeves approximately 3 frames across in four rows of frames.
I had just enough time the first day to print contact sheets for three of the rolls. The remaining two rolls had to wait until the next day I was in the darkroom.
With film in the camera, any time the shutter is opened, light will enter the camera and expose the film lying against the inside of the camera back. This image is about 2" wide (the approximate width of the film) by 2" high. The film is manufactured to hold 12 such images, but there are things one can do to vary this. Rolling film only partway, for example, will single-expose a 2" swatch and double-expose a swatch matching how far one rolled the film. You can shoot entire rolls like this; they come out looking a little "artistic", as the exposure is different across the real estate of the film, but I've had some really good results with this method and enjoy shooting this way.
Since Holgas are cheap, people modify them to hold 35mm film (exposing a bigger swatch of the film than one normally is used to), or two rolls of 35mm film one above the other. Or you can shoot a roll of 35mm on the lower half of the roll and then re-shoot it on the upper half of the roll. The possibilities for really wild uses of film are endless.
For 120 film, a plastic frame can be clipped into the camera, allowing you to expose less than the 2" wide swatch.
In my opinion, the best use of 120 film is the square exposure that is approximately 2" by 2" (or 6 x 6 centimeters, as 120 implies). I find these proportions very graceful. The negative is large and the image crisp (one hopes). It is far easier to work with a grain focuser and I am generally enlarging to a lesser degree than I would enlarge a 35mm negative. When printing onto, say, 8 x 10" paper the image occupies a nice position with landscape orientation. The balance created by the white margin gives a pleasant weight.
With a Holga, the image is captured so that the floor or horizon of the subject runs parallel to the edge of the film. This makes handling of the negatives straightforward; they face you directly when you lay them out in negative sleeves or in a negative carrier for the enlarger. I mention this because my Mamiya C3 (an old-fashioned portrait photographer's twin lens camera) and other such cameras capture the subject with the floor or horizon of the image running perpendicular to the edge of the film. Since the image faces run lengthwise, this makes for more steps in handling them when working with them. So there was yet another reason for using the Holga with 120 film.
When shooting with 120 film, it rolls off of its plastic spool and onto another spool. When done shooting, you remove both the film (rolled onto the takeup spool) and the original but now empty film spool. You can recycle the original spool over to become the take-up spool for the next roll of film.
The film is removed from the camera without letting it spring open to expose everything you took all that time to photograph. There are fiddly bits of paper the size of a cigar band you can moisten and wrap around the roll to hold it secure. I usually put the film into a piece of aluminum foil for security. I might store it in the refrigerator if I can't develop it right away.
The next step is done in the dark, ideally in a film-loading cubicle, which is a light-tight closet except for the barest bit of light one can discern peeking beneath the door. I always lean way over the work table in the closet. In case I drop the film, it hopefully will not fall onto the floor and risk becoming exposed. To develop the film, you release and unwind the roll, separating the film from its backing paper. The bit of tape that held the two together can be folded over the edge of the film. Then the film is inserted into and rolled onto a plastic reel in such a manner that none of the photographic surfaces touch each other. You can imagine an old movie projector, with film rolling from spool to spool. Imagine the spools being made such that there is space between the film surfaces as the film rolls onto the spool. In this way, the 120 film spool can be placed into a developing tank, and with the right agitation during development, all of the film will receive appropriate contact with the developing media.
Another reason for using Kodak film is the size of the film. Because the exposed surface is larger, to me it presents a larger accident waiting to happen. With a more delicate film I worry about introducing wrinkles into the film as I load it onto the developing reel, and about scratching the film. The film is vulnerable in the developing tank when I am agitating the chemicals across the surface, even so, I try to agitate gently. Lastly, other films I've tried require a longer developing time, and over the life of a project this can add to a significant increase in time.
There is a critical time when the film is hanging to dry and it is vulnerable to scratches and to dust. This can be the bane of working with film in a shared or academic environment. On more than one occasion I've come upon a student -- so captivated by an image -- leaning into the drying racks, eagerly flicking the protective curtain this way and that, and more than likely dusting everyone's negatives with fine particles from the curtain (which is intended to be a dust magnet.)
This first batch that Susan shot included 5 rolls of film. For safety's sake, I developed these in three separate batches, each taking a little over an hour. I then hung the negatives to dry for about an hour and a half each.
When the negatives were dry, I cut them into segments to fit into clear plastic negative sleeves. Each roll fits on a page of negative sleeves approximately 3 frames across in four rows of frames.
I had just enough time the first day to print contact sheets for three of the rolls. The remaining two rolls had to wait until the next day I was in the darkroom.
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Frame 1: Introduction to the Holga
You're perhaps eager to see the photos. This is, after all, a visual medium we're using.
Please have patience, and experience this project the same way we did, in that there was no instant gratification.
It seems that each step has been slow and meaningful.
First I taught Susan how to load and shoot the camera, and she shot her first photo. Actually, this is her second photo, as during her first shoot, she left the lens cap on.
You might think that loading film is a small task, but the Holga takes 120 film. This comes in a longish spool that must be locked in place on the left side of the camera and then carefully pulled out and caught onto the take-up reel on the right side of the camera. As a sighted person, I match what I see to what I feel to know when the film is at the right spot to close the camera back, and to know when and how to advance the film.
Susan showed a remarkable adeptness and willingness to feed the pesky film into an elusive take-up slot -- all the while talking to and coaxing the camera to do her bidding. We found we counted 'ticks' and 'turns' of the film take-up reel to know where we were.
In shooting with Holga, I often advance the film bit by bit, to overlap images one upon the other. Since Susan had not had this experience, she viewed the film as having discrete segments that needed to be exposed. She expressed anxiety at needing to know exactly where each frame should be.
I initially explained how the film fed out, and attached less importance to the placement of each shot. To give you an idea of how complicated the process is, here is what I had written for Susan in my cheat sheet of instructions:
"Place the newly opened film roll into the left compartment and hold it snug there while pulling out the leader of the film. You’ll need to unfold the very tip of the leader, which has been cut down to about an inch wide. This leader tip of film needs to be captured into the slot on the take-up reel which you put into the right compartment. To do so, while keeping hold of the film in the left compartment pull out the film across the camera until the tip reaches to about the farthest edge of the camera (I think that’s what we measured.) Make sure the tip is unfolded by folding it backwards against itself. Now that the tip is straight, feed it into the slot. Now while holding the film roll AND the film in the slot, start winding the film winder to take up slack in the film. One needs to get the film gripping sufficiently before putting the back of the camera on.
By my memory, it took 5 ticks of the film winder to take out the slack, and 43 complete turns after that to get to the first frame. I would probably continue to do maybe 4 of the turns before putting the back on to make sure the film is winding properly."
Gee, can you stand on your head at the same time, too? Undoubtedly, this sequence of activities would be daunting to the average person on the street! But sitting there with Susan was quite an experience, as she stepped up to the challenge and conqured the film-loading process.
Then we encountered the problem of how to determine which end of the camera back was "up"! More on this later.
Please have patience, and experience this project the same way we did, in that there was no instant gratification.
It seems that each step has been slow and meaningful.
First I taught Susan how to load and shoot the camera, and she shot her first photo. Actually, this is her second photo, as during her first shoot, she left the lens cap on.
You might think that loading film is a small task, but the Holga takes 120 film. This comes in a longish spool that must be locked in place on the left side of the camera and then carefully pulled out and caught onto the take-up reel on the right side of the camera. As a sighted person, I match what I see to what I feel to know when the film is at the right spot to close the camera back, and to know when and how to advance the film.
Susan showed a remarkable adeptness and willingness to feed the pesky film into an elusive take-up slot -- all the while talking to and coaxing the camera to do her bidding. We found we counted 'ticks' and 'turns' of the film take-up reel to know where we were.
In shooting with Holga, I often advance the film bit by bit, to overlap images one upon the other. Since Susan had not had this experience, she viewed the film as having discrete segments that needed to be exposed. She expressed anxiety at needing to know exactly where each frame should be.
I initially explained how the film fed out, and attached less importance to the placement of each shot. To give you an idea of how complicated the process is, here is what I had written for Susan in my cheat sheet of instructions:
"Place the newly opened film roll into the left compartment and hold it snug there while pulling out the leader of the film. You’ll need to unfold the very tip of the leader, which has been cut down to about an inch wide. This leader tip of film needs to be captured into the slot on the take-up reel which you put into the right compartment. To do so, while keeping hold of the film in the left compartment pull out the film across the camera until the tip reaches to about the farthest edge of the camera (I think that’s what we measured.) Make sure the tip is unfolded by folding it backwards against itself. Now that the tip is straight, feed it into the slot. Now while holding the film roll AND the film in the slot, start winding the film winder to take up slack in the film. One needs to get the film gripping sufficiently before putting the back of the camera on.
By my memory, it took 5 ticks of the film winder to take out the slack, and 43 complete turns after that to get to the first frame. I would probably continue to do maybe 4 of the turns before putting the back on to make sure the film is winding properly."
Gee, can you stand on your head at the same time, too? Undoubtedly, this sequence of activities would be daunting to the average person on the street! But sitting there with Susan was quite an experience, as she stepped up to the challenge and conqured the film-loading process.
Then we encountered the problem of how to determine which end of the camera back was "up"! More on this later.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Getting Started
I chose a Holga for this project because I thought the camera would lend a certain intimacy to the photos and also, more than likely, a dash of "uncertainty" to the process. Plus, I love working with medium format and immediately try to share my enthusiasm with folks who have only experienced 35 mm.
Anyone who has used a Holga knows how temperamental these lightweight plastic cameras can be. While they are cheap and can be toted around like a toy, each one is different -- with its own quirks and (sooner or later) problems.
My Holga has so far demonstrated a pretty good ability to take clear pictures. The back doesn't fall off and the lens usually stays where you set it. The lens appears to be one of the better ones and gives crisp images, or as crisp as a plastic lens can. I still have the lens cap, and the shutter still works. The tripod attachment can get a bit funky, so you don't want to screw it on very hard. But other than occasionally leaking light (making for interesting vignetting), the camera most often does what one tells it to do.
Anyone who has used a Holga knows how temperamental these lightweight plastic cameras can be. While they are cheap and can be toted around like a toy, each one is different -- with its own quirks and (sooner or later) problems.
My Holga has so far demonstrated a pretty good ability to take clear pictures. The back doesn't fall off and the lens usually stays where you set it. The lens appears to be one of the better ones and gives crisp images, or as crisp as a plastic lens can. I still have the lens cap, and the shutter still works. The tripod attachment can get a bit funky, so you don't want to screw it on very hard. But other than occasionally leaking light (making for interesting vignetting), the camera most often does what one tells it to do.
I paid somewhere around $35 for my camera at Glazer's, the Mecca for darkroom photography here in the Pacific Northwest, and have endured No End of Eye-Rolling and Rude Remarks for paying such an exorbitant figure for it. As you well know, artists are ... frugal. They make cameras out of things like cardboard boxes and zucchinis. But at the time I was in a hurry to complete a class project requiring a medium format camera and didn't have time to order a cheaper camera online.
I modified my camera somewhat so that Susan could find the different apertures and determine her focusing distance. I say "the different" apertures, but actually there are only two: f8 (i.e. "Cloudy") and f11 (i.e. "Sunny"). Coming from the factory, these settings have little imprints, one depicting clouds and the other sun.
I modified my camera somewhat so that Susan could find the different apertures and determine her focusing distance. I say "the different" apertures, but actually there are only two: f8 (i.e. "Cloudy") and f11 (i.e. "Sunny"). Coming from the factory, these settings have little imprints, one depicting clouds and the other sun.
To make my modifications, I used an extreme version of Velcro(R) which has a very sticky backing -- suitable for using on brick -- and nibs that are stiff and can be felt individually from one another. I worked these with an X-acto knife so the nibs made Braille letters, then cut them out and affixed them to the aperture settings.
For shutter distances, I carved rows of nibs that counted out "1", "2", "3" and "5" settings which represented 1, 2 and 3 meters, and infinity, respectively.
The Holga has two shutter speeds: Normal, which is approximately 1/100th of a second (until the spring is fatigued and either breaks or slows down); and Bulb, which will hold the shutter open as long as the shutter lever is held down. As a side note, Bulb setting is the one I normally use, as I like to shoot in the dark and illuminate my subjects with various kind of lights like flashlight and candlelight. For now, suffice it to say I made labels for these settings as well.
To see a typical Holga, click here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)